Sac State to use tool that records students to proctor online exams
Respondus Monitor records feed from webcam to verify testing conditions
April 24, 2020
Sacramento State will implement browser extension Respondus Monitor to proctor online exams, according to an email to students sent Friday by Steve Perez, Sac State provost and vice president of academic affairs.
The tool will record students’ feed from a webcam to be used by instructors to verify that the testing conditions were “as expected,” Perez said.
According to Respondus’s website, the Respondus Monitor tool builds on its lockdown browser iteration, “using a student’s webcam and industry-leading video analytics to prevent cheating during non-proctored exams.”
Story continues below screenshot.
Respondus Monitor also requires students to agree to a privacy statement “with which they may not be comfortable,” Perez said. He said these students will need to inform their instructors if agreeing to the privacy statement is problematic for them.
Students are already expressing concerns about the Respondus Monitor tool.
“Not only does the browser implement extremely restrictive measures almost to the point of functioning as malware, but the webcam is also an extreme invasion of privacy,” said Sac State music education major Grant Johnson via Reddit direct message. “The eye-tracking technology and pre-test checks in particular (which can include showing a complete view of the room you’re testing in as well as possibly even showing your ID) are frankly quite ridiculous.”
Story continues below tweets.
Hi. We have notified our IT staff about this. If a student feels watched or harassed, they should contact our Office for Equal Opportunity (Title IX) office: https://t.co/FyQ4BDxuS9. Thank you.
— Sacramento State (@sacstate) April 24, 2020
Sac State business administration major Edgar Bonifacio said he doesn’t believe the decision to use Respondus Monitor could have been made if student opinion had been considered in the process.
“Clearly, the student body is not considered when making these decisions,” Bonifacio said via Reddit direct message. ”I also agree that this is a vehemently egregious invasion of privacy. I don’t want to download software that enables my webcam to track my eyes and scan the room I’m in.”
Bonifacio added that he thinks any student who wants to cheat is going to do so with or without Respondus Monitor.
“Instead of ‘keeping honest people honest’ like locks on doors do in real life, they’re allowing teachers to acquire hours of footage of students in their own homes,” Bonifacio said. “I dare them to guarantee that all of that footage will be safely and wholly deleted, and I double dare them to even come up with a way to ensure that it will be.”
Alexa Theodosi, a Sac State psychology major and student parent, said she was uncomfortable with the concept of the browser. Theodosi has children who are stuck at home, which means she has to study and take tests while also watching them.
“I have to wear headphones with white noise to block them out while I try to focus. I still get interrupted, and I have to walk away from my computer at times to help them,” Theodosi said via Reddit direct message. “I already lose time on my exams from this. I don’t need the added stress of being filmed, my kids being filmed, and being potentially marked down or disqualified for appearing to walk away from my computer/wearing headphones/ or being interrupted. It’s already stressful enough.”
The tool does not work with devices other than Windows, Mac and iPads, so students who do not have access to any of these devices will need to tell their instructor so they can prepare an alternate version of the exam, Perez said.
“I think it is unfair solely because I do not have the funds to afford an expensive device to support that,” a student said on a Reddit thread about the tool. “I have a Chromebook. I had to ask my job if I could come into the office (when we’re on lockdown) to use their computers for an exam.”
In response to a request for further information about the tool, the university sent a link to a Sac State Respondus Monitor FAQ page.
The page says that students who are concerned about privacy and feel uncomfortable with the terms of using the browser should reach out to their instructor so they can make “alternate arrangements.”
Additionally, it says that if students do not have access to the required technology, students can request for instructors to make these alternative arrangements.
Walter Yost • Apr 28, 2020 at 6:18 pm
As a Journalism instructor at Sac State I would advise any student to take careful consideration before agreeing to any exam that uses a a tool like this. In my course “Media Literacy & Critical Thinking” my students study the growing threat to our privacy. I use the following quote from W. James Potter, a professor of communications at UCSB: “The responsibility rests with each of us to protect our own privacy. If we do not do the work to protect ourselves, we will likely have very little privacy left.”
Remember, as Provost Perez points out, if you are uncomfortable with the Respondus Monitor tool you can ask your instructor for an alternative.
Sue Escobar • Apr 27, 2020 at 1:00 pm
As a professor/faculty member and one who care extremely deeply about privacy, the US Constitution, freedom and liberty, I find the use of this tool to be very disturbing and concerning. I have never used it myself, as I feel as though university students are adults, and at some point, we have to entrust that people will be guided by their own morals and values of honesty and integrity. Sadly, our world has horrible examples of that; therefore, it is upon each of us to maintain the high road. No amount of proctoring, following someone, etc. will work here. What this is, is an extension of the police state, of which we are watching the unfolding on a massive scale in real time. I would never use this tool in my classes, and I strongly encourage my colleagues to refuse to use it as well. Be creative, find another way to instill honesty and integrity into your students. Extending the arm of the nanny state is not a path I would ever support. Cheers and peace, Sue C. Escobar, J.D., Ph.D., Professor of Criminal Justice
On behalf of all Sac State students • Apr 26, 2020 at 11:42 am
This is a complete invasion of privacy. Faculty are not superior to students, nor are students ti faculty. This type of extreme measures are not need, and if you dont trust your students that much then shut down the classes completely until further notice. Apparently, your campus does not even have reasonable decision makers.
Music Major • Apr 26, 2020 at 5:09 am
I also have a chromebook, and a lot of my professors are stressed out ass is, so what are these other arrangements? Them watching me themselves? There busy enough as is.
Concernedcitizen • Apr 26, 2020 at 2:56 am
i really hope this is a big joke or something. This has gotten completely out of hand. For a public university to intrude on our privacy like that should be illegal. First it was the policy that would require you to get permission to film or record on a public campus. Now this. Who comes up with this stuff? Im just glad this is my last semester.
Sarah • Apr 25, 2020 at 11:52 pm
I’m already feel uncomfortable using a webcam for zoom meetings because I don’t think it’s secure, now tracking eye movement? I’m sorry, no
Leah • Apr 25, 2020 at 9:04 pm
This is absolutely ridiculous. Sac State can not take away my privacy and rights. This is simply insane. I am already incredibly careful on what sites and apps I use and I refuse to let myself be recorded. This is completely crossing a boundary that should not be crossed. So disappointed in Sac State for not protecting their students.
Saying this from all Sac State Students • Apr 25, 2020 at 2:30 am
Nah Fuck that shit.
StudentMom • Apr 24, 2020 at 4:31 pm
Get ready for 75+ minutes of Led Zeppelin and my boys bouncing off the walls and making fart jokes.