What started as an attempt to become the world’s first edible plate resulted in a glorious masterpiece of a creation that took the United States by storm as a staple of American culture.What am I referring...
For those who grew up in Sacramento, they might wonder why someone from another country would choose to study abroad in a place like this. With so many other options, such as New York or San Francisco,...
If you thought nothing could be more painful than getting booed off stage for the Super Bowl hand off ceremony, try getting compared to Nixon and the Watergate incident.New Jersey Governor Chris Christie,...
One of the biggest myths in the National Football League is the idea that a player cannot lose his job after suffering an injury and missing playing time.
When a player goes down, there is already a backup ready to take his spot. All it takes is one injury to another player and the backup now becomes the starter.
Now, whether or not the original backup eventually becomes the full-time starter depends on the situation with the injured player.
NFL players have an average career of three-and-a-half years. It is a mistake for them to become comfortable and think they will play forever.
It is an even bigger mistake to think they are not replaceable. Whether the injury is serious or not, a football player is only one play away from being knocked out of the game – either physically or through demotion.
I think the reason this is such a hot topic in the football community is because people have different views on whether or not being replaced is fair.
To be honest, I do not know what is fair and what is not fair. That is a gray area to me.
Perhaps the only concrete reason to claim an injured player’s swapping is fair is if the newcomer provides more potential and ability at the position.
There are some players in the NFL that are unquestionably elite at their respective position.
Players like quarterbacks Tom Brady and Aaron Rodgers on offense and linebackers Patrick Willis and DeMarcus Ware on defense are simply too good to be easily replaced.
If any of these players were to get injured, their job would not be in jeopardy.
Controversies only occur when there is a legitimate brewing of tension between choosing the original player and his replacement.
The most recent controversy in the NFL involves the San Francisco 49ers’ quarterbacks Alex Smith and Colin Kaepernick.
Smith, the eight-year veteran, boasted his best season under center in 2011 after leading the 49ers to the NFC Championship game against the New York Giants. The previous six years were very up and down for Smith and the team. Many fans, including the media, had given up on him.
While his stock has risen the last season and a half, many still doubt him.
Smith was knocked out of the Nov. 11 game against the St. Louis Rams with a concussion and replaced by second-year quarterback Colin Kaepernick.
Kaepernick has started two games since then - against the Chicago Bears and New Orleans Saints - and played very well in route to winning both games.
I do not think there would be a quarterback controversy if Kaepernick did not display a different, and better, level of play than Smith had – but he has.
Kaepernick’s ceiling is unknown, but it undoubtedly is higher than Smith’s.
For the last eight seasons, I have come to understand the type of player Smith is. He is careful with the football, relies on check-downs and is not a deep-threat quarterback.
Now, this is fine and wins games, but fans want more.
Kaepernick, although relatively still unknown in his abilities, provides more ability at the position. He is currently on a hot streak and should get better each game.
Smith will lose his job to Kaepernick, but what the future holds remains to be seen.
I personally do not think it is fair. After all, Smith has been a winning quarterback for the past two seasons.
But when Kaepernick had to step up for the injured Smith, he outplayed him in every way. Kaepernick under center opens the 49ers passing offense up and creates a new, explosive dimension it lacked before.
While most fans would assume Sacramento State’s fall sport with the largest fan base, in the largest venue, gathering the most attention would be poised for the most success in 2012 (I’m looking at you, football), the sport with the real threat for a conference title should be women’s volleyball.
After finishing the 2011 season with an overall record of 17-15 and a 10-6 Big Sky conference record, finishing third for the Hornets was a step in the right direction after failing to finish above fifth place since 2007.
Women’s volleyball has been one of the strengths of Sac State’s athletic program in the last 15 years. Since joining the Big Sky Conference in 1996, Sac State has made the Div. 1 NCAA tournament 10 times (six more than any other member of their conference).
Last year, under the leadership of Head Coach Ruben Volta, the team was one of the best in the conference when it came to home-court advantage (8-5 record). In fact, since 1996 the team has posted a 175-48 record on its home court.
What made them so good last year was their team defense. In 2011, the team was ninth in the nation in digs per set (18.39) and 13th in blocks per set (2.76). They were the only team in the nation to rank in the top 35 in both categories.
As for the offense, they finished in the bottom half of the Big Sky conference in kills per set (11.93) and hitting percentage (.171). With Coach Volta implementing a new 6-2 offense, it will allow the setter to stay in the back while three attackers up front can get aggressive.
Although the team lost four of its top players to graduation last spring, there are still doses of optimism with the nine returning players and six newcomers (including two transfer students coming from Div. 1 teams).
It’ll be interesting how the team chemistry develops, but rest assured, this team will be competing for another Big Sky conference title in 2012.
Fall sports are under way and the Sacramento State women’s soccer team has the most potential and promise to take home a conference championship.
After missing the Big Sky conference championships by two places last season, women’s soccer is back with a 30-player roster and the intensity to win.
The women of Hornet soccer have already shown improvements by winning the first game of the season to University of Nevada Reno, which they lost to last year by a score of 2-1.
The players have the agility, strength and endurance to beat every team in the conference as long as they stay consistent, which should not be too hard considering the lengthy roster.
The depth in the roster will allow the players more efficient playing time. If someone is winded and needs a break, the bench is full of fresh bodies to put on the field.
To make the long list of players even more impressive, nine of them are incoming freshman, meaning they are younger, fresher and less injured.
One of the freshmen is Hannah Gendron, a goalkeeper out of Davis. She is replacing 2011 senior Savannah Abercrombie, who gave up 22 goals during the last season.
Gendron gave up only six goals during her varsity season last year in high school and not one goal her 2010 26-game junior varsity season.
Senior forward and team captain Jordan Carlberg will also be a huge contribution to the team this year by looking at last season’s records. She led the team in shots and shots on goal, was second in assists, third in points and fourth in goals.
Overall, Sac State women’s soccer is secure with a variety of diverse players and will be a dominant force in the Big Sky conference this 2012 season.
The 2011 Sacramento State football team finished with a 4-7 record, but there are reasons to believe a winning season is around the corner. Regardless of the team’s record the previous year, it can adopt a winning mentality if they focus on becoming better today than they were yesterday.
At the start of training camp, there were more than 40 new players vying for a spot on the 2012 Sac State football team.
With the addition of new players comes the question of how they will mesh with the returning members of the team. Football is a team sport, one composed of three facets: offense, defense and special teams.
After losing team leaders such as quarterback Jeff Fleming to graduation, some may view the abundance of new players as a question in regards to building team chemistry and cohesion.
Perhaps it is this new element that will spark a surge in production.
After all, the team is led by Marshall Sperbeck, the sixth-year head coach who led the Hornets to a stunning 29-28 win over the Oregon State Beavers last season. This win marked the first against a Football Bowl Subdivision team in 11 attempts, arguably making it the Hornets’ biggest victory in school history.
The overtime victory against Oregon State gained nationwide attention, and the sense of pride and hope that resulted should be remembered and carried over into this season.
Last season, the Hornets lost three games by seven or fewer points. If the team can work out the kinks of last season, there is reason to believe they can be a winning team this season.
A fuel to light their fire could come from the recent preseason polls released predicting their success, or lack thereof. The Hornets were picked to finish ninth in the Big Sky Conference by the coaches and 10th by the media.
For the players on the football team, a sense of “us against the world” would certainly be an acceptable feeling. And it is this feeling that has often lifted teams out of seeming obscurity and into the spotlight.
